Kategorie: English

As announced in the German part of this blog, a weekend workshop on peer production and the peer economy took place during the last weekend (29-31 August) in the nice little town of Hiddinghausen in the German Ruhr Area. A detailed three-part report on the workshop, which was a fully self-organized event with about 30 participants, is available in German. The first part of the workshop was dedicated to my proposal of how to generalize the principles and practices of commons-based peer production into a full-fledged peer economy; in the second part we discussed ways of growing the range and versatility of peer production that are possible here and now. For this English-language documentation of the event, I’ll focus on this second part.

As a first initiative for facilitating the peer production of physical goods and services, I proposed to set up a „Universal Production Set“ (UPset): an integrated collection of free or open design. The goal of the UPset would be to provide designs, blueprints, and other production know-how for all areas of life, but with a a special focus on things that are essential for people to live a good life.

(mehr …)

Stefan Merten, founder of Oekonux project, is going to give a presentation at FrOSCon — the Free and Open Source Conference in Sankt Augustin, Germany, 23th – 24th of august. The presentation titled »The (Open Source) World in 2020 — A History Based Look into the Future« is already online. Stefan’s style is to cut down complex analysis to handy statements, where he draws his conclusions from.

Here are the conclusions giving a good overview of the talk:

• 1984 — Very beginnings may be hard to notice
• 1996 — Good ideas grow because they are useful to people
• 2008 — Basic principles are strong enough to spread out
• First basic principle: Selbstentfaltung — Something what individual and society wants
• Second basic principle: Openness — Technology may make way for new societal phenomenons
• A new mode of production emerges — Something wrong with classic economy 😉
• Power from new principles — Oekonux thesis: New mode of production => new society
• Five-step model of development — There is hope!
• Capitalism as a successful germ form: 200 years back — A new mode of production as a germ form can take over
• A peek into the future — Vertical expansion is quite sure — Horizontal expansion depends on many aspects
• Deeper embedding — More won’t happen in 12 years

Please read the details (aka bullet points).

Conclusion of the conclusions of the bullet point list: Qualitatively, in 2020 we have the same situation as in 2008.

[Deutsche Übersetzung unten – german translation below]

This is a repost from Michel Bauwens in P2P-Foundation Blog. Michel writes:

In a recent discussion on Oekonux, I came up with the following gradation of payment vs. voluntary contributions in peer production, which echoes the distinction made by Oekonux between singly-free software (a commons as output, but input is wage labour); and doubly-free software (commons output and participatory input).

(mehr …)

[This is a translation of the corresponding german post]

Now I have yet to write about the »New Socialism« of Cockshott/Cottrell, although the respective book (german: »Alternativen aus dem Rechner«, english: »Towards a New Socialism«) is still lying on the pile of unread books. Motive of this post is an interview with Allin Cottrell in »junge Welt« (leftwing german daily newspaper). There Cottrell argues, that the planned economy of the Soviet Union has failed due to its limited capacities of computing power. However, within the arms industry they had done well.

But they did not have computing resources, in order to extend detailed planning to the entire civil economy; they only could concentrate on a small subset of the products. [own translation of all quotes]

How do Cockshott/Cottrell view the new socialism, for which they see a chance of realization in Venezuela and Bolivia?
(mehr …)

Rob Carlson schreibt in einem Artikel, dass es jede Menge Parallelen zwischen Moores Law und der technologischen Entwicklung im Biotech-Sektor gäbe. Die Fähigkeiten der Gen-Sequenzer verdoppeln sich seiner Ansicht nach genauso wie Transistoren auf dem Chip.

Die Folge: Das Gen-Labor in der Küche für jeden der will ist nicht mehr weit weg. Das wirft natürlich enorme Probleme auf. Gatacca erscheint bei dieser Perspektive eher als harmlose Zukunftsvision.

Carlson setzt auf einen Open-Source-Ansatz um diesen Problemen gerecht zu werden, weil Verbote die billige Biotech nur in einen unkontrollierbaren Schwarzmarkt treiben würden:

The best way to keep apprised of the activities of both amateurs and professionals is to establish open networks of researchers, perhaps modeled on the Open Source Software (OSS) movement, and potentially sponsored by the government during their embryonic phases. The Open Source development community thrives on constant communication and plentiful free advice. This behavior is common practice for professional biology hackers, and it is already evident on the Web amongst amateur biology hackers.¹⁴ This represents an opportunity to keep apprised of current research in a distributed fashion. Anyone trying something new will require advice from peers and may advertise at least some portion of the results of their work. As is evident from the ready criticism leveled at miscreants in online forums frequented by software developers (Slashdot, Kuro5hin, etc.), people are not afraid to speak out when they feel the work of a particular person or group is substandard or threatens the public good. Thus our best potential defense against biological threats is to create and maintain open networks of researchers at every level, thereby magnifying the number of eyes and ears keeping track of what is going on in the world.

Ich bin da ja eher skeptisch. Auch Handfeuerwaffen sind billig und ich wünschte mir, sie wären verbotener als sie es sind.

[Update 18.6.2009: Es gibt eine deutsche Übersetzung dieses Aufrufes]

During the past decade the phenomenon of Free Software has become successful and well-known. It is still amazing how in the realm of software the creativity of so many volunteers leads to products which are useful for the whole mankind. In 1999 the Oekonux Project started with analyzing this phenomenon and trying to understand the special features of Free Software as a social and political enterprise.

Today, beyond the Free Software world, projects based on a similar approach of peer production are rapidly emerging, including Wikipedia and many more. It is time to look at peer production from a broader perspective.

(mehr …)

The Bank of Common Knowledge exports the dynamics of Free Culture and the Copyleft philosophy to general processes of knowledge generation and transmission among citizens. Work processes and methodologies are researched while the production of content, mutual education and citizen participation is carried out for the purpose of giving free access to the knowledge generated by the communities in which the Common Knowledge Bank is installed.

The contents generated are Copyleft, and can be copied, redistributed or modified freely. Based on the organization of meetings among citizens, the Bank of Common Knowledge experiments with new forms of production, learning and citizen participation. Read on. [via]

Video from Barcelona:

(mehr …)

There are enough reasons to reject the EU treaty — militarism, surveillance state, and neoliberalism are only three keywords. But we can’t, because we are not allowed to vote. Only the Irish people can vote. Support them to vote NO for us!

Es gibt genug Gründe den EU-Vertrag abzulehnen — Militarismus, Überwachungsstaat und Neoliberalismus sind nur drei Stichworte. Aber wir können den Vertrag nicht ablehnen, da wir nicht abstimmen dürfen. Nur die irische Bevölkerung darf abstimmen. Unterstützt sie, um für uns mit NEIN zu stimmen!

My draft paper »Copyfarleft — a Critique« has been extensively improved by Mute-Magazine (thanx, Ben!), and has now been published online. Teaser:

In July last year Mute published Dmytri Kleiner’s critique of copyright and it’s ‚radical‘ copyleft alternative, presenting a reformist programme based on Ricardo’s ‚iron law of wages‘. But Marx demolished this analysis 140 years ago, argues Stefan Meretz. Time for FLOSS to catch up?

Read the full text here.

I don’t know why Alan Cox is using »Town Council« instead of the good old term »Community«, but his lessons learnt from a project are interesting:

Release code right from the start. It doesn’t matter if its not very useful. (mehr …)